Trade and Inclusive Growth

Authors

  • Manisha Singh Research Scholar, Department of Economics, University of Allahabad, India.
  • Sunil Kumar Chaturvedi Professor, Department of Economics, University of Allahabad, India.

Keywords:

Trade, Inclusive growth, Investment, International integration

Abstract

This paper attempts to explain the linkages between trade and inclusive growth or long-term sustained growth along with productivity and employment avenues for both households and firms within a country. Kamel (2013) defined Inclusive growth as growth that is accessed and shared equitably by all segments of society. Inclusive growth then may be understood as a holistic concept at once addressing growth, poverty and inequality. This paper explores the linkages between trade, Investment and Inclusive Growth. A country’s level of participation in the regional and global economy and whether or not it is a part of global value chains largely determines impacts on poverty and inequality. This paper attempts to understand and explain the complex relationships which work in transmitting benefits from trade led growth to households. This transmission mechanism is explained through three aspects viz. trade policy related changes, trade facilitation policies and FDI policies. In this process the paper also examines whether South-South trade is better aligned with the needs of developing countries. The paper concludes that International Integration can promote Inclusive Growth when workers and firms are able to select for themselves which activities they want to engage in and when firms can adopt superior foreign technologies and expertise.

References

Winters, L. Alan (2000). Trade, trade policy and poverty: what are the links? Discussion Paper No. 2382. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

World Bank (2011). World Development Report 2011:Conflict, Security, and Development. Washington D.C.

Winters. L. Alan, Neil McColluch and Andrew McKay. 2004. “Trade Liberalization and Poverty: The Evidence thus Far.” Journal of Economic Literature 42(1): 72-115.

Mankiw, N. Gregory (2013). Defending the one percent. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 27, No. 3, Summer, pp. 21-34.

Ianchovichina, Elena, and Sussana Lundstrom (2009). What is inclusive growth? A note prepared at the request of donors supporting the Diagnostic Facility for Shared Growth. Paris: OECD. (mimeographed)

Sen, Amartya Kumar (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

Jorge, Arnold, and Josef Rafalowicz (2012). Trade, growth and inequality: a brief recap. A background note prepared for Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2013. Bangkok: ESCAP.

www.growinginclusivemarkets.co

Mann, Catherine L., John S. Wilson, and Tsunehiro Otsuki (2004). Assessing the benefits of trade facilitation: a global perspective. World Economy, vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 841-871

Duval, Yann, and Chorthip Utoktham (2010). Beyond trade facilitation: impact of the domestic business environment on export competitiveness in Asia and the Pacific. In Rising Non-tariff Protectionism and Crisis Recovery. Bangkok: ESCAP. ST/ESCAP/2587. Chapter VI. (www.unescap.org/tid/publication/tipub2587.asp)

United Nations, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (2008). Economic and Social Survey of Asia and the Pacific 2008. Sales No. E.08.II.F.7.

United Nations Development Programme (2010). The MDGs: Everyone’s Business: How Inclusive Business Models Contribute to Development and Who Supports them. New York.( http://business.un.org/en/assets/e705f241-e7db-44f3-8874-b76e56ea6d16)

Bhagwati, Jagdish, and T.N. Srinivasan (2002). Trade and poverty in the poor countries. The American Economic Review, vol. 92, No.2, pp. 180-183.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-02

Issue

Section

Articles